The Bleeding Edge
“One of my concerns is that the government is not being transparent with us about what those risks are.”
“And so, I’m of the opinion that people have the right to decide whether to accept a vaccine or not, especially since these are experimental vaccines.”
The speaker went further to add:
This is a fundamental right having to do with clinical research ethics… And so, my concern is that I know that there are risks. But we don’t have access to the data, and the data haven’t been captured rigorously enough so that we can accurately assess those risks. And therefore, we don’t really have the information that we need to make a reasonable decision.
For the above comments, unsurprisingly, the speaker was banned from YouTube (Google) and LinkedIn (Microsoft) as well.
As we know well, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and the mainstream media have been actively censoring and banning those with whom they disagree. No longer is an open discourse of ideas and information allowed… Only discourse that fits their narrative.
What did surprise me was that LinkedIn, a social media platform for professionals, jumped into the censorship fray.
Perhaps Microsoft, given its latest efforts to become even more dominant by boxing out the competition, was sitting on the sidelines waiting to see if the others got into trouble for crossing the line. They didn’t.
What is shocking about this is who the speaker is. He isn’t someone with an angle. This man is not anti-vaccine at all or someone with a political bent.
The speaker of those words is Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA vaccine. These are the same vaccines produced by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna.
And for fairly obvious reasons, Dr. Malone is a widely known and respected expert in the field. He is precisely the kind of person that I would like to hear from concerning the subject matter.
Yet LinkedIn shut down his account. In a letter from LinkedIn, the company justified the closure “due to multiple violations of LinkedIn’s User Agreement and Professional Community Policies against sharing content that contains misleading or inaccurate information.”
Misleading or inaccurate information? Really? How is it that the inventor of mRNA vaccines can be censored for spreading misleading or inaccurate information regarding a technology that he created? It is a stark reminder of the incredible absence of consensus amongst the medical community.
Even the balanced, rational comments that Dr. Malone made have been censored.
Dr. Malone also claimed, “Vaccines save lives. These vaccines have saved lives.” He further elaborated concerning the risk/benefit profile, stating, “I can say that the risk-benefit ratio for those 18 and below doesn’t justify vaccines, and there’s a pretty good chance that it doesn’t justify vaccination in these very young adults.”
If we want to understand the extent to which a small number of large companies are filtering our access to information and trying to influence the way we think, this is a perfect example.
Dr. Malone’s comments were thoughtful and factual. They were based on scientific research and the desire to provide us all with the kind of transparency and information that we need to make decisions about our own health and the health of our children.
And the thing is, Malone’s comments are not unusual. They aren’t even in the minority. They are widely shared – and widely censored.
The removal of his account caused quite a stir and resulted in an apology from LinkedIn. His account has since been reinstated.
But after posting on the account that LinkedIn is “not powered for actual scientific discussion,” he was warned that he would be deleted again if he transgresses.
And that’s the world that we’re living in right now. One of thought police and thought crimes judged by a very small number of people. It appears that many have forgotten George Orwell’s 1984 was not an instruction manual.
And for those who haven’t yet read the book, now would be the time to do so.